"War czar" foolishness

Here's a link to the Register's editorial on the idea of a "war czar" to oversee the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The key to me? The "war czar" will officially be an assistant in the National Security Advisor's office, with a staff of 11. With a staff of 11 he's going to whip recalcitrant bureaucracies into stepping up to support the war effort more effectively? I doubt it.