Thursday, April 01, 2010

Is Obama just obtuse about Afghanistan?

Most of the other hypotheses don't seem to make much sense, so I'm starting to approach the conclusion that Barack Obama is just not that smart. It should hardly come as a surprise. He undoubtedly has an IQ slightly higher than normal or he wouldn't have made it through college and law school (though it might be interesting to see his transcripts, which to my knowledge he hasn't released yet). But in retrospect what he seems to have displayed throughout his career is more cunning or what some would call sagacity rather than real learning. He has obviously been extremely ambitious for a long time; perhaps he has had the presidency in mind since early college days. So he has been alert to the main chance, aware of the kinds of alliances he ought to make, aware that a sensitive autobiography would make him look special in the eyes of the easily duped intellectuals of our fading empire, aware of how to present himself as a multicultural black man. But his reputation for being really smart is belied by so many of his actions.

What has me going this time is not health care, though there's plenty of evidence there, but Afghanistan. His visit there earlier this week cemented this war as "his" war. But the war makes so little sense that you would think almost any reasonably intelligent person -- I suspect he didn't take any international relations classes in college and he certainly has not shown any special interest in that field heretofore, so maybe that's a mitigating factor -- would have been able to figure it out. The official line about keeping al-Qaida out of Afghanistan is obviously absurd -- al-Qaida hasn't been there since 2002. He has to know the Taliban is an indigenous Afghan outfit without international ambitions, so while a takeover would be sad for many Afghans it would have few if any international repercussions. He is obviously aware enough that Karzai is a corrupt tool and uncooperative to boot that it annoys him. So why does he insist on maintaining a U.S. presence in the Graveyard of Empire? Does he really want to preside over the fall of the American Empire? Is he so deluded as to think we can bring a semblance of democracy, stability or semi-decent governance in the next 15 months or so? Is he just cunning enough to realize that historians tend to rank American presidents who have presided over wars as "greater" than those who presided over peaceful periods?

Maybe he's just not that smart.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Regarding not disclosing his transcripts, it might be he is intentionally not releasing his birth certificate as a red herring. It probably is perfectly legit, but all the hubbub over that keeps people from the real deal -- his transcripts. Obama is a great speechifier, but he is not very bright on his own. His transcripts probably reflect his poor grades in core courses and P/F grades in classes anyone would have taken for the easy grade, and that he didn't take any real intellectually challenging courses.

Anonymous said...

As for your observations on Afghanistan, you leave out one benefit of leaving them to their own Taliban devices -- an end to the opium trade. Instead of a war to make the world safe for democracy, we are fighting to make the world safe for drug traffickers.

Anonymous said...

Obama is all style and no substance. He is eloquent where Bush was not. But I don't think either man has any great wisdom. The military-industrial complex / U.S. government 'machine' makes it almost impossible for the USA to leave a country once it settles down in there. Have we left Korea? Japan? Okinawa? Europe? Are we ever going to give Guantonimo back to its rightful Cuban owners? How about normal relations with Cuba? How long do we have to maintain a brain-dead embargo that should have been ended long ago? The truth is what passes for foreign policy in the U.S. today is just an "auto-pilot" blanket one-size fits all imperialism. One day the plane is going to crash into the sea....

guccishoesbags said...

Gucci shop
Gucci bags
Gucci shoes
Gucci ON sale
Gucci Belts
Gucci small accessories
Gucci hats & scarves
Gucci wallets
Gucci Handbags
women Gucci shoes
Men Gucci shoes
Gucci
Replica GUCCI SHOES
Replica GUCCI handbags
wholesale gucci shoes
cheap Gucci shoes
cheap Gucci handbags
discount gucci shoes
Gucci shop
Gucci bags
Gucci shoes
Gucci ON sale
Gucci Belts
Gucci small accessories
Gucci hats & scarves
Gucci wallets

Anonymous said...

To be a noble lenient being is to from a kind of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an cleverness to group aleatory things beyond your own manage, that can take you to be shattered in unequivocally outermost circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something remarkably outstanding relating to the prerequisite of the ethical autobiography: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the fitful and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a prize, something somewhat fragile, but whose acutely precise beauty is inseparable from that fragility.